Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vonn Ströpp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:51, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vonn Ströpp[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable artist. Article is full of OR and possible hoax material. Tagged for notability since 2014. BLP concerns. Szzuk (talk) 10:18, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:47, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:47, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:47, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. Not a hoax – there's some coverage in The i [1], Student BMJ [2] and a book published by Reaktion Books [3]. But I'm not sure the totality of coverage is really enough to be significant. The Student BMJs articles are mainly submitted and reviewed by students, and its biographical details on Von Stropp read like they're taken from the exhibition catalogue. The article in The i is a series of quotes by the owner of a gallery selling his work, so it seems a bit questionable whether it is truly independent of the subject. Hmm, really not sure on this one, so I'd be interested in some more views... --Qwfp (talk) 20:34, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I too found some book sources, but none are in-depth mentions. Lacks SIGCOV.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:34, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.